slander of title

It would be monstrous if a corporation could maintain no action for slander of title through which they lost a great deal of money.

Slander of title is one of the "specialized" common law intentional torts.

Slander of title is a form of jactitation.

Novell denied selling them Unix, prompting them to sue for slander of title.

After the refinancing is recorded, if your attorney re-records his lis pendens, that might be slander of title.

In law, slander of title is normally a claim involving real estate in which one entity falsely claims to own another entity's property.

Magritz was convicted in 2003 on seven counts of criminal slander of title and sentenced to five years in prison.

SCO files slander of title suit against Novell.

Novell also filed its own Slander of Title counter-lawsuit against SCO.

In addition, this term may refer to acts such as slander of title or other similar misrepresentations of the ownership of physical or intellectual property.

The limitation period for libel, slander, slander of title, slander of goods or other malicious falsehood is one year.

Unix vendor SCO Group Inc. accused Novell of slander of title.

Disney later threatened to sue a Georgetown University law student who wrote a paper confirming Brown's claims, alleging that publishing the paper could be slander of title.

In response, SCO sued Novell for slander of title in Utah, home state of both SCO and Novell.

In March, the SCO Group's case against Novell for slander of title was heard by a jury in Utah, which ruled in favor of Novell.

In response to these challenges from Novell, SCO filed a "slander of title" suit against Novell, SCO v. Novell.

On July 29, 2005, Novell filed a counter-suit against SCO claiming slander of title, breach of contract, failure to remit royalties, and failure to conduct audit obligations.

The term slander of title is somewhat of a misnomer as slander refers to that which is spoken yet the tort slander of title requires publication.

SCO filed a second amended complaint on February 6, 2006, containing the original slander of title claim as well as several new claims, including unfair competition, copyright infringement, and breaching a purported non-compete agreement.

SCO sought to have the court declare that SCO owned the rights to the Unix code, including the copyrights, and that Novell had committed slander of title by claiming those rights for itself.

B C1894C0, against Leonardo DiCaprio and Tobey Maguire for Declaratory Relief, Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage, Breach of Contract, Slander of Title, and Injunctive Relief.

A slander of title suit can be pursued with merit in a variety of circumstances including, but not limited to, "the filing of an invalid lien against real property or virtually any type of recordable instrument recorded against a property by one without privilege which is untrue."

The court found that Novell had not committed slander of title, was not now required to transfer the copyrights under the APA, that its copyright waivers issued to IBM were authorized, and that they did not violate the covenant of good faith.

Following the partial summary judgment rulings in the SCO vs Novell Slander of Title case, Judge Kimball asked the parties in SCO v IBM to prepare by August 31, 2007 a statement of the status of this case.

Cohen's attorneys fashioned these allegations into claims for breach of contract, fraud, to set aside foreclosure, slander of title, unfair competition, trade secret misappropriation and accounting, but Judge Miller found that that loan was in default as early as December 2008 and that "Plaintiffs' claims are without merit."