A mistake is an incorrect understanding by one or more parties to a contract.

The values between consideration passed by each party to a contract need not be comparable.

A person who signs as party to a contract.

She could not make a Will or be party to a contract or appear in court.

More significant problems arise where parties to a contract wish to vary its terms.

Article 3 states the general rule that the parties to a contract have freedom of choice over the applicable law.

"Consideration" indicates the fact that all parties to a contract have exchanged something of value.

"Two parties to a contract can effect a change in the contract.

Where one party to a contract makes a false statement on which the other party relies.

Force majeure is invoked when parties to a contract cannot make good because of situations beyond their control.

But fundamental to this exercise, to both the parties to a contract, is the competitiveness of the product, process, service or like entity.

First, the doctrine of privity requires that only a party to a contract can sue.

If both parties to a contract use standardization, the upshot may be a 'battle of the forms'.

To avoid such claims it is essential that all parties to a contract are fully aware of its scope and intent.

Parties to a contract can use a contractual provision that is allowed under California law, called a reference proceeding.

Expert determination is a means by which the parties to a contract jointly instruct a third party to decide an issue.

All parties to a contract must be in agreement on the essential matters to form a binding contract.

A unilateral mistake occurs when only one party to a contract is mistaken as to the terms or subject-matter.

It determines the circumstances in which promise made by the parties to a contract shall be legally binding on them.

A second qualification to the basic proposition is that the parties to a contract are usually required to observe recognized standards of behaviour.

To prove the parties to a contract.

The case sets out that parties to a contract were only liable for such loss of profit suffered by the result from a wrongful act.

It was noted that parties to a contract cannot unilaterally revoke the rights of a third party once they have received an actual benefit.

The 1977 Act also deals with clauses exempting a party to a contract from liability for misrepresentation.

Dunlop thus was a third party to a contract between Selfridge and Dew.