alienability

More widespread are differences in syntactic construction, depending on alienability.

In Tlingit, nouns are subject to the concept of alienability.

The court, however, will likely not enforce this waiver because it is a restraint on the alienability of property.

Alienability is the capacity of a given commodity to be separated, physically and morally, from its seller.

This rule is an exception to the general rule in property law that favors free alienability.

Alienability may refer to or be associated with:

The alienability distinction is the most common kind of binary possessive class system, but it is not the only one.

The rationale of the doctrine is to prevent the copyright owner from restraining the free alienability of goods.

Alienability refers to the ability to dissociate something from its parent - in this case, a quality from its owner.

Alienability (grammar)

Currently, different representations of organs and other body parts coexist blurring the lines between alienability and inalienability.

Alienability (disambiguation)

The Law Merchant, a precursor to modern commercial law, emphasised the freedom to contract and alienability of property.

More subtle cases of syntactic patterns sensitive to alienability are found in many languages, even some Indo-European languages.

It emphasised contractual freedom and alienability of property, while shunning legal technicalities and deciding cases ex aequo et bono.

What the majority judges sought in the case was just what the projectors of the present property reform in England were after, the free alienability of land.

Alienability as a grammatical concept in some languages, such as Tlingit, Rama, or Paama, related to the concept of possession.

This theme, which relates the development of individualism and alienability specifically to homo economicus,has been a longstanding concern in philosophical and political anthropology (e.g. Dumont 1977).

Hawaiian is commonly cited as an example of a language with an alienability difference, because it uses a different preposition to mark possession depending on alienability.

The morphological distinction between nouns taking II agreement and III agreement in Choctaw only partly coincides with the semantic notion of alienability.

However, the distinction between a '(alienable) of' and o '(inalienable) of' is used for other semantic distinctions less clearly attributable to the basic alienability distinction except in metaphorical ways.

Previous decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Nonintercourse Act did not restrict the alienability of Pueblo peoples or lands.

Noun possession divides all nouns into two open classes of possessable and unpossessable nouns, and the possessable nouns are further divided based on their alienability.

John Locke, and Montesquieu are also key figures in the unfolding of the concept of sovereignty, and differ with Rousseau and with Hobbes on this issue of alienability.

Although systems of this type are generally described with the terms alienable and inalienable, this terminology is not particularly appropriate for Choctaw, since alienability implies a semantic distinction between types of nouns.